Is it real or is it Hollywood? - SFGate - http://www.sfgate.com/movies...
Mar 30, 2014
from
"We all know that movies are inaccurate - to time, to science, to logic, to history. We also know that sometimes it matters, and sometimes it doesn't, but we disagree there. The line between what matters and what doesn't is not only different for everybody, but it also varies within every person. For example, if you're an expert on something, small errors will leap out at you that you might otherwise not notice, or ignore. In October, the astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson made some Twitter comments about the movie "Gravity" that were repeated everywhere. Some of what Tyson called "Mysteries of Gravity" were the kind of things that only an astrophysicist would care about: "Nearly all satellites orbit Earth west to east, yet all satellite debris portrayed east to west." Other mysteries were just funny: "Why (Sandra) Bullock's hair, in otherwise convincing zero G(ravity) scenes, did not float freely on her head." Obviously, that mystery isn't a real mystery to anyone, including Tyson. A Hollywood leading lady cannot have a bad hair day, not in the Wild West, not in a concentration camp, not even in outer space. But one of Tyson's tweets was especially arresting because it went to the heart of the movie, touching on the most haunting and dramatic moment of the entire story. (In fact, if you haven't seen the movie yet, skip the next two paragraphs, because they contain a key spoiler.) Tyson writes, "When (George) Clooney releases Bullock's tether, he drifts away. In zero-G, a single tug brings them together." Should have known Of course. We should have known that. What's more, Bullock's character should have known that. The only explanation for her not knowing is that she wanted to be the star of the movie, and she couldn't do that with Clooney floating around getting all the best lines. Obviously, given the trajectory of "Gravity," we know why Clooney had to go, but it does cast that painful moment in a strange other light. Scientifically (if not dramaturgically), that did not have to happen."
- Anne Bouey
"Movies need not be slaves to truth or to accuracy - at least not until they make claims to truth or accuracy. Fiction is great, not in spite of itself, but because it's fictional, because it's untethered. The only caution I'd add is that sometimes accuracy can imply an opportunity worth considering: What would have happened had Bullock given Clooney a little tug? What might have happened if the butler were allowed to really like Nancy Reagan?
We'll never know."
- Anne Bouey

