we need to elevate our system of dialogue/ being knowledgeable is part of it/ understanding the process of thinking/ the system of thinking is a part of it too. This requires creativity/ developing models for many to objectively engage thru an on ramp in exchanging more detailed thought.
Is there a writer who used patterns/ chants/ accumulated characterizations, while developing depth-first descriptive language/ flow of thought/ descriptive characterizations? Do writers do this? I'm not sure writers ever characterize explicit thoughts, find direct and explicit logical ways to lay them down, quickly, and using the language as an explicit example representation of the thought. That would be more like coding/ language modding/ while discussing general cognitive and philosophical models and knowledge-pivoting orderings we can use to view the world/ other thoughts. - David Lynch
process of thinking - models of perceiving the world - expressed using writing that looks more like tags, than sentences. - David Lynch
thanks for the likes, and you are too generous. lol - David Lynch
it would be kind of like developing a religion with the purpose to facilitate faster dialogue. via sharing over-layered examples of ways of perceiving simple nameless objects, with the point being to constantly derive new perceptions by yanking out and formulating new derivations. So the writings would have no inherently logical consistently, and our writing would change to tree ordered stacks, and what would facilitate the writing and comprehension would be our similar understanding of the permutations - David Lynch
of meaning possible by navigating the writings, (by reordering them in different written trees), and our ability in quickly referencing the first draft/ rendering of this so called perception bible. - David Lynch
without this non-religious perception bible, we risk the ultimate con, of relying on hierarchical power for making decisions instead of distributed intelligence. - David Lynch