iPhone 4 SLR Mount lets you shoot 5-megapixel photos with your $3,000 lens -- Engadget - http://www.engadget.com/2011...
Jul 7, 2011
from
Michael W. May,
Iván Abrego,
Steven Perez,
DAL,
Elina Katariina Leppänen,
Andrew C (see frenf.it),
Buğra Bayrak,
rønin,
vicster.,
Zulema ❧ spicy cocoa tart,
Faraz Mullick,
Brian Johns,
Jo Booth,
Kevin (aka ThreadKilla),
and
Kristin
liked this
From the Redonculous Department of Idiocy.
- Brian Sullivan
April fools?
- Shannon - GlassMistress
I think it's cool, just not $250 cool.
- Rodfather
Think of it this way, wouldn't you like Instagram, 360 Panorama, iMovie, and a 3G connection on your DSLR? You can make a quick and dirty movie and share it right away.
- Rodfather
I have a friend who would actually really dig this. (He's a professional photographer too.) He just wouldn't be interested in it for that price point.
- SAM
If someone really needs to carry a $3000 lens around, why wouldn't he just carry a camera as well? It looks good but of no use.
- Faraz Mullick
I don't think a person would be limited to using it with $3000 lens, what Rodfather said is a good use case, and some people appreciate the novelty. Of no use to you would be reasonable.
- SAM
Hooking up a SLR lens to an iPhone and calling it a DSLR is a bit like sticking a prancing horse logo on a Fiat 500 and calling it a Ferrari.
- Brian Sullivan
+1 Brian
- Juan Pablo González
Who called it a DSLR? It's a lens mount.
- Rodfather
Other than the price, what is the actual objection to this product?
- That one guy. Bren.
Rodfather- I thought that was implicit in your earlier comment.
- Brian Sullivan
No, you're tripping. I wouldn't mind having an OS in a DLSR.
- Rodfather
As the owner of a 6MP DSLR, I don't really see what's ridiculous about 5MP pictures through a good lens.
- Bruce Lewis
Rodfather -- so your comment earlier has nothing to do with this product -- you were just daydreaming about a product that you wish existed?
- Brian Sullivan
It says exactly what it says. Why such much hate? There's even a group that makes movies on the iPhone only. For them, it would be a cool addition. You can use lenses you have sitting around and make a movie with different lenses. What's so horrible about that?
- Rodfather
Bruce -- adding a big lens to a 5MP iPhone does not turn it into the equivalent of a 5MP DSLR -- not even close. Size in MP matters a lot less than size of sensor -- and iPhone's sensor is very small.
- Brian Sullivan
Rodfather - no hate implied -- at least not to you. I just think the product is ridiculous.
- Brian Sullivan
No answer to my question? Okay.
- That one guy. Bren.
Bren - to me seems to a solution looking for a problem -- it is technology for technology's sake -- -- just because it is possible to do something it doesn't always make sense to make and try to sell a product that does it.
- Brian Sullivan
I think Rod has already made a compelling argument against that, Brian. Maybe it's just me, but your vitriol for this product seems disproportionate to your stated complaint about the product. As I understand it, the only problem (aside from price) is that *you* don't have a use for it.
- That one guy. Bren.
I see it as just a lens mount. That's it. On a side note, this reminds me when people started making adapters for consumer video cameras to mount 35mm lenses. This was huge. Only around 4 years ago too. That was the first time people could use interchangeable lenses on a relatively cheap video camera. It opened up so much more possibilities for students and indie filmmakers. Now that DLSR's can shoot video, it changed again. Maybe in the near future, DLSR's will have Android on there and will be fast enough to do processing/effects in the camera and not need a computer at all.
- Rodfather
Bren - not sure it was intended as vitrol or should be characterized as such, I don't know how else I can assess and present a point of view except as well .. my point of view. I definitely have no use for this product (or for an iPhone for that matter)
- Brian Sullivan
"ridiculous department of idiocy" struck me as fairly vitriolic for a product that is, in reality, simply not useful to you. Again, maybe that's just me.
- That one guy. Bren.