"Falsifiability is not the definitive criteria in identifying science, but it is important.
Heaven's Gate's ideas were examples of blind religion, not organic spirituality and are therefore a poor example that renders your argument fallacious. Understand that I do not use the words spirituality and religion as synonyms.
I wash my ass and brush my teeth religiously, which is good for hygiene. Conversely, religious practices in the area of spirituality are often harmful to humanity."
- Mattb4rd
"Christian faith is a "tentative hypothesis" is it not? Not proven, yet believed by some. Does the source of the belief, intellectual or spiritual, really matter? Semantically, I suppose."
- Mattb4rd
"Some factions within the scientific community are practitioners of religion. Blind religion is not particularly helpful, regardless of the god(s) revered."
- Mattb4rd
"They can coexists, spiritualists and scientists. Both sides of the intellectual spectrum have blind practitioners of religion, however, and therein lies the problem."
- Mattb4rd
"Correct. I once heard Hawking say that to know some secrets of the universe would be to know the mind of God. Scientists need not be so frackin pedantic to be taken seriously."
- Mattb4rd
"Isn't the genesis of science curious inquiry? It seems more accurate to say that science ends when consensus begins. That is, if science is the search for truth, not necessarily the result of the search."
- Mattb4rd
"I didn't see or hear anything that proved any of that evidence (not testimony) false beyond a shadow of a doubt. That's what has to be there to prove 2nd degree murder."
- Mattb4rd