"> I wouldn't think it was especially bad... links to chrome to not be posted I don't even... D: You may be ok with it but I don't think that would go over well. Or maybe you just hate Chrome that much? :P > Perhaps, but he's not doing that. He is. The script is not his content. It's abuse of copyright because of pulishers & distributers. > So this is what you see as giving up your rights? You are giving up your right for copyright holders to not make requests with no threat of legal action that you feel are threatening because there's an implied threat? Not sure I understand this. I mean it's not possible to make the request without the implied threat because one you have the attention of the copyright holder the risk of escalation is there. The very fact that he wants it taken down is a problem. He _wants_ to infringe on fair use because there's pressure from potential investors to do so. > And you are aiding it in a way that causes him harm, as we have established No. I'm aiding..." - Tanath