"Not strictly true, you must put the '!' just after the opening '{{', not before the variable.
This will work: {{! comment }}, this will not: {{ !comment }}"
- Marlin Forbes
"Your headline is going to get you into trouble. No one has proved murder nor been charged with it. Sensationalist and irresponsible journalism."
- Marlin Forbes
"There's no room in the coop for that sorta action.
We have the same problem, really. Only gonna become more challenging as we expand to fill the Earth. Come on, people now, smile on your brother... :)"
- Marlin Forbes
"What shade of white we talking about here? Or non-white? Is there a line between shades? Are there multiple lines? I must confess I'm colour-blind and this doesn't make much sense."
- Marlin Forbes
"Sigh, yes I know. I'll repeat what I posted earlier: There is a bright, beautiful world out there, which is not filled with fascism, fear and prejudice. You see what you want to see."
- Marlin Forbes
"I know what it means, and I understand its import. There is a bright, beautiful world out there, which is not filled with fascism, fear and prejudice. You see what you want to see."
- Marlin Forbes
"And who will decide which of the rich should have their wealth distributed? How do you figure out who is inappropriately wealthy and who earned their money legitimately? Or is ANYONE who has more than you to blame? Very few wealthy people got their money through greed and/or corruption. Most of the people have earned it by way of creating value, for which they have been fairly compensated. The people at the top are mostly there because they've earned it. Mostly, not all. Now if you propose that god is somehow gonna make it equal, swapping the 'bottom rail' for the 'top position' would mean that the poor people would become the richest in the country, and the rich would become poor. Aside from the basic fact that this is not equal, just the opposite, this simply would not work. Let's imagine that happens: most of the poor people (who have NO experience with handling large sums of money) would squander their riches within months of receiving it, and would have no clue on how to generate..."
- Marlin Forbes
"Unless you read my whole comment (and didn't just react to the word 'attack'), and understood what 'ad hominem' means, your comment is worthless."
- Marlin Forbes
"Conversely why would they create false survey results for 1 out of 109 countries surveyed? Wake up and smell the coffee. And calling someone's patriotism into question is not an argument."
- Marlin Forbes
"I'd also imagine that since you're asking for the reporter's identity that the facts on their own are irrefutable and require an 'ad hominem' attack?"
- Marlin Forbes
"It's not an opinion piece, the article is relaying facts from a UN survey. The reporter does not seem to have added any personal interpretation. If you want to call the survey into question, take it up with the UN."
- Marlin Forbes